>
A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond
An ecological perspective
Andreas Hölzl

Series

ISBNs

digital: 978-3-96110-102-3
hardcover: 978-3-96110-103-0
softcover:

DOI

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1344467
Published: 20180829

Cite as

Hölzl, Andreas . 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond : An ecological perspective. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 20). Berlin: Language Science Press.
@book{sidl20,
author = {Hölzl, Andreas },
title = {Atypology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective},
year = {2018},
series = {sidl},
number = {20},
address = {Berlin},
publisher = {Language Science Press}
}

Proofreaders

  • Martin Haspelmath
  • Linda Lanz
  • Stefan Hartmann
  • Benjamin Brosig
  • Alec Shaw
  • Maksim Leonidovich Fedotov
  • Ludger Paschen
  • Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
  • Sune Gregersen
  • Jeroen van de Weijer
  • Amir Ghorbanpour
  • Jaime Peña

Typesetters

Illustrators

About this book

This study investigates the distribution of linguistic and specifically structural diversity in Northeast Asia (NEA), defined as the region north of the Yellow River and east of the Yenisei. In particular, it analyzes what is called the grammar of questions (GQ), i.e., those aspects of any given language that are specialized for asking questions or regularly combine with these. The bulk of the study is a bottom-up description and comparison of GQs in the languages of NEA. The addition of the phrase and beyond to the title of this study serves two purposes. First, languages such as Turkish and Chuvash are included, despite the fact that they are spoken outside of NEA, since they have ties to (or even originated in) the region. Second, despite its focus on one area, the typology is intended to be applicable to other languages as well. Therefore, it makes extensive use of data from languages outside of NEA. The restriction to one category is necessary for reasons of space and clarity, and the process of zooming in on one region allows a higher resolution and historical accuracy than is usually the case in linguistic typology. The discussion mentions over 450 languages and dialects from NEA and beyond and gives about 900 glossed examples. The aim is to achieve both a cross-linguistically plausible typology and a maximal resolution of the linguistic diversity of Northeast Asia.

About Andreas Hölzl

 

Andreas Hölzl is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Comparative Linguistics of the University of Zurich. He holds a Magister Artium (M.A.) in Sinology and a PhD in General Linguistics from the University of Munich, where he worked as a research assistant and taught courses in both subjects. Since 2015 he has also been a devoted community proofreader for Language Science Press. He obtained a scholarship from the German Academic Scholarship Foundation for his dissertation as well as from the German Academic Exchange Service and the China Scholarship Council for a one-year stay in China. His research interests include the Tungusic language family, the languages of Asia, language typology, areal linguistics, and general questions of evolution (human and linguistic). 

Chapters